Charlotte Gray 2001

Critics score:
32 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Bruce Newman, San Jose Mercury News: When it finally stops being exasperating, Charlotte settles into a genuinely moving tale. Read more

Jay Carr, Boston Globe: It's that most unfortunate of commodities, a thing of muffled usualness, virtually generic. Read more

Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: If this is melodrama, it's melodrama of a superior rank, and I salute it. Read more

Michael Wilmington, Chicago Tribune: Mostly a sparkless film: a would-be thinking-person's tearjerker whose cliche plot lines and ice-cold sentimentality sabotage its best intentions. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: Blanchett and Crudup are on the verge of stardom, but they're toppled here by a familiar and tepid story. Read more

Kevin Thomas, Los Angeles Times: Despite Cate Blanchett's strong performance in the title role, the World War II spy film is lacking the requisite thrills. Read more

Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times: Gives us a woman's view of World War II: There's a taut sense of danger here, and a different kind of valor at work. Read more

Susan Stark, Detroit News: Mounts a romantic drama of the World War II era in mostly glossy, shallow terms. Read more

Philip Wuntch, Dallas Morning News: Rather good at its best and never truly bad at its worst, Charlotte Gray occupies a gray zone. Read more

Stephen Holden, New York Times: The movie works so diligently to convey a spirit of heroic uplift and fails so completely that it feels like a tragic misfire. Read more

Gene Seymour, Newsday: Listless and shockingly lifeless. Read more

Bruce Westbrook, Houston Chronicle: The pace is so lethargic and the focus so diffuse that it's hard to get a fix on Charlotte beyond needless glamorization. Read more

Paul Tatara, CNN.com: Blanchett is an extraordinary actress, and she does what she can to flesh out the material. But Charlotte is one of the least active underground operatives in movie history. Read more

Steven Rosen, Denver Post: While Blanchett's presence is surely felt in virtually every scene of the movie, her acting isn't. We don't connect with her at all. Read more

Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly: This is a frustratingly inert story. Read more

Rick Groen, Globe and Mail: The movie's problem is that the screenplay (by Jeremy Brock) accentuates the book's weaknesses while skirting its strengths -- much of the detail is gone, but the melodrama is more florid than ever. Read more

Rex Reed, New York Observer: This is what they used to call a real 'movie movie.' Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: While Charlotte Gray is too well-made to be considered sub-par, it is not stimulating enough to be regarded as much better than mediocre. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: This is a movie that looks great, is well-acted, and tells a story that you can't believe for a moment. Read more

Charles Taylor, Salon.com: Redolent with luxurious, old-fashioned pleasures. Read more

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: Charlotte is another fine portrait for Blanchett's growing gallery. Read more

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Read more

Peter Howell, Toronto Star: Have that bottom-scraping feeling of being the final story to be told about the great conflict. Read more

Time Out: Read more

Claudia Puig, USA Today: A sweeping World War II drama that displays so much promise with its beautiful cinematography and superb portrayal by Cate Blanchett that you scarcely notice (or even care) that the story is a bit thin. Read more

Todd McCarthy, Variety: Read more

Jessica Winter, Village Voice: Brock's script deepens the purples of Faulks's prose while airbrushing out the grays. Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: Blanchett, who gets better with every performance, takes hold of this movie with a firm but subtle hand. Read more