Luther 2003

Critics score:
44 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

John Monaghan, Detroit Free Press: For a movie about a man of ideas, Luther is pretty exciting stuff. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: Luther is a film that you know will end with one of those codas telling us what a profound life he led. But the movie itself just doesn't leave that kind of footprint. Read more

Ellen Fox, Chicago Tribune: The film short-hands a lot of stuff, but it's gripping for a while. Read more

Stephen Holden, New York Times: As the film veers uncertainly between meticulous historical recapitulation and shameless hokum, it brings enough characters to populate a mini-series. Read more

Wesley Morris, Boston Globe: Curiously flat. Read more

Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: After a summer of numbing mindlessness, there is something frankly refreshing about a movie that deals even superficially with as significant a figure as the rebellious 16th century theologian Martin Luther. Read more

Houston Chronicle: Read more

Michael Booth, Denver Post: A few too many amateurish techniques and oversimplified confrontations hold Luther back a notch or two from greatness, and stamp it instead as entertaining Lutheran cheerleading. Read more

Scott Brown, Entertainment Weekly: Heady theological badminton, as vigorously thoughtful as it is piously historical. Read more

Gary Dowell, Dallas Morning News: A glossy but unimaginative dramatization of the man's life. Read more

Scott Foundas, L.A. Weekly: Manages to make a travesty of its title subject. Read more

John Anderson, Newsday: An informative immersion in the history of both Catholic and Protestant churches, and a rather refreshing take on medieval morality. Read more

Jack Mathews, New York Daily News: Deadly material, full of self-righteousness and devoid of balance. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: ... I anticipated that Luther himself would be an inspiring figure, filled with the power of his convictions. What we get is an apologetic outsider with low self-esteem, who reasons himself into a role he has little taste for. Read more

Steven Winn, San Francisco Chronicle: For all its scope and detail, Luther fails to convey the sense of history moved by a compelling individual. Read more

Leah McLaren, Globe and Mail: About as swashbuckling as a history lesson gets. Read more

Susan Walker, Toronto Star: Luther is rarely presented as anything other than a preacher. He preaches even in casual conversation. Read more

Time Out: Read more

Robert Koehler, Variety: Even with Joseph Fiennes as a visceral, intellectual Martin Luther, the latest bigscreen take on the Christian reformer proceeds like a stultifying history pageant rather than a movie with a pulse of its own. Read more