Waiting for Forever 2010

James Rocchi, MSN Movies: Waiting for Forever isn't just bad; it's fascinatingly bad. Read more

Stephen Holden, New York Times: More often than not, I felt suffocated by the gaseous sentimentality and lightheadedness of a story that drops in subplots that it can't begin to develop. Read more

Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic: "Waiting for Forever" evidently is an attempt to portray love as purest when expressed by those who are most innocent, untainted by the ugliness of the real world. But it misses the mark completely, coming off instead as creepy. Read more

Adam Markovitz, Entertainment Weekly: An indistinct romantic-dramedy-ish something or other. Read more

Sheri Linden, Hollywood Reporter: An ill-conceived romantic drama that's as sappy, vague and awkward as its title. Read more

Robert Abele, Los Angeles Times: With "Waiting for Forever," an insipid contemporary fairy tale about a lovestruck young vagabond shadowing a childhood sweetheart he can't bring himself to approach, we get stalking, juggling and cancer. Happy Valentine's Day! Read more

Joe Neumaier, New York Daily News: Director James Keach's movie is so annoyingly dipsy-doodle that TV veteran Bilson, trying hard to look haunted and angsty, is boxed in. Read more

Kyle Smith, New York Post: A drippy romance that makes Nicholas Sparks look like Leo Tolstoy. Read more

Una LaMarche, New York Observer: By the time Emma realizes that something might be wrong with her playful, pajama-clad paramour, there are so many red flags she might as well be at a communist rally. Read more

John Anderson, Variety: A movie that eludes the viewer's grasp, because it's arguing a position auds will find instinctively wrong. Read more

Aaron Hillis, Village Voice: [Waiting for Forever is] strangely unaware of its overt creepiness. Read more