Mickey Blue Eyes 1999

Critics score:
45 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Jeff Millar, Houston Chronicle: Reminds us of other films that used similar devices better. Read more

Susan Stark, Detroit News: This is a movie that takes Hugh's charm as a granted and makes a good argument for its point of view. Read more

Jane Sumner, Dallas Morning News: We've seen this fish - out - of - water plot before, but clever writing and careful casting give it a fresh bite and looniness. Read more

Stephen Holden, New York Times: Has more than enough laughs to justify its silly, scatterbrained premise. Read more

Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: Preposterously convoluted plot twists! Read more

Entertainment Weekly: Read more

Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly: Read more

Globe and Mail: Read more

Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: Read more

Peter Rainer, New York Magazine/Vulture: Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: It's tough to make a case denying that Mickey Blue Eyes is of passable entertainment value, but it's equally difficult to argue that it offers anything fresh or inspired. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: Mickey Blue Eyes has most of the ingredients in place for another one of those married-to-the-mob comedies, but the central character has to hold it together, and Hugh Grant is wrong for the role. Read more

Mary Elizabeth Williams, Salon.com: Uninspired, recycled! Read more

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: Read more

Derek Adams, Time Out: Read more

Lael Loewenstein, Variety: Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: Grant should consider hypnotic therapy to help him forget Mickey Blue Eyes! Read more