Walking Tall 2004

Critics score:
26 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: With at least two or three plot threads left dangling, the film sprints to a climax that is undercut by its abruptness. Read more

Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: Yes, it's all astoundingly dumb. But it's also surprisingly effective, largely due to Johnson, a charismatic, likable screen presence who displays none of the arrogance and vanity of a Vin Diesel or Steven Seagal. Read more

Allison Benedikt, Chicago Tribune: I know it's a movie, and sure, the bad guys are pretty brutal, but siccing this hulk of a man on the town, no matter what his intentions, doesn't spell justice to me. Read more

Mark Rahner, Seattle Times: When the credits roll after the climactic beatdown, the story feels like it's missing an act. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: ... a real disappointment. Read more

Bob Longino, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: What we have here is another fine example of the devolution of Hollywood. Read more

AV Club: Read more

Wesley Morris, Boston Globe: Monotonously by-the-numbers. Read more

Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: The image of the Rock standing tall in the poster for Walking Tall, hefty piece of lumber delicately poised to decimate the ungodly, is powerful and persuasive. Too bad you can't say quite the same for the film. Read more

Houston Chronicle: Read more

Lisa Kennedy, Denver Post: Does have its fair share of fun. Read more

Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly: This Walking Tall loses in depth what it gains in star power. Read more

Jennie Punter, Globe and Mail: [The Rock] may be ready to rumble, but Walking Tall is a stumble. Read more

Gary Dowell, Dallas Morning News: Solid but unremarkable. Read more

Robert Abele, L.A. Weekly: Cartoon mayhem that doesn't have the desperate vengeance to stir us up emotionally. Read more

Jan Stuart, Newsday: As remakes go, Walking Tall exemplifies the dumbing down of stupidity. Read more

Stephen Whitty, Newark Star-Ledger: It's certainly a busy little movie, although none of it makes much sense. Read more

Jack Mathews, New York Daily News: Has none of the social edge that made the Vietnam-era film the pride of the hixploitation genre. Read more

Dave Kehr, New York Times: Unlike so many of our recent action heroes, the Rock seems to be less about anger and revenge than about justice and self-discipline, a nuance that is also a saving grace. Read more

Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel: A big step backward for The Scorpion King. Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: The film is comprised of four violent action scenes tied together by nearly 50 minutes of alternately hilarious (unintentionally, of course) and dull filler. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: A cartoon of retribution and revenge. Read more

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: A routine showcase, modest in its aspiration and effective within its limits, entertaining in the moment but, in the end, faintly silly. Read more

Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune: The film is thankfully free of the nasty aftertaste that accompanied the Death Wish and Dirty Harry revenge fantasies of the '70s. Read more

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Read more

Peter Howell, Toronto Star: This revised Walking Tall has only kinetic energy going for it. Read more

Time Out: Read more

Mike Clark, USA Today: If the movie has one virtue, it's a kind of surface vitality that results from director Kevin Bray's speed-at- all-costs approach. Read more

Scott Foundas, Variety: This new version moves along at a good clip and provides a terrific action leading role for Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson. Read more

Ed Halter, Village Voice: A ridiculous macho slugfest attempting to reassert the '80s-style roid-raging revenge narrative. Read more